Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rebuild for python311 #23

Merged

Conversation

regro-cf-autotick-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has been triggered in an effort to update python311.

Notes and instructions for merging this PR:

  1. Please merge the PR only after the tests have passed.
  2. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.

Please note that if you close this PR we presume that the feedstock has been rebuilt, so if you are going to perform the rebuild yourself don't close this PR until the your rebuild has been merged.

If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/autotick-bot/actions/runs/3643644441, please use this URL for debugging.

@conda-forge-linter
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@leofang
Copy link
Member

leofang commented Dec 8, 2022

@conda-forge/cuda-python I'd like to get this merged (one CI timed out but we can retry at the master branch), any objection?

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

@m3vaz, what do you think?

@leofang
Copy link
Member

leofang commented Dec 8, 2022

@conda-forge-admin, please rerender

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 8, 2022

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/cuda-python-feedstock/actions/runs/3652083582.

@m3vaz m3vaz merged commit a481a36 into conda-forge:main Dec 8, 2022
@m3vaz
Copy link
Contributor

m3vaz commented Dec 8, 2022

LGTM

@regro-cf-autotick-bot regro-cf-autotick-bot deleted the rebuild-python311-0-1_h8739d3 branch December 8, 2022 23:56
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Thanks Mark! 🙏

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ source:
sha256: 3c95a732a077c540d1cc58c4c10d6779f0260c8aa63a6e34f79d55689f09ae26
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like the jobs on main are now failing due to the checksum changing. This can happen since GitHub archives are generated on-demand as opposed to stored. Thus if a timestamp changes on a file that goes into the archive, the checksum could potentially change.

  File "/opt/conda/lib/python3.10/site-packages/conda_build/source.py", line 109, in download_to_cache
    raise RuntimeError("%s mismatch: '%s' != '%s'" %
RuntimeError: SHA256 mismatch: 'ef54ada5d607387f59950cfb3c3852e5816b62824402d289227b8066e8353489' != '3c95a732a077c540d1cc58c4c10d6779f0260c8aa63a6e34f79d55689f09ae26'

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would propose we verify we get the same checksum when downloading locally. If so, send a PR to refresh the checksum and bump the build/number

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Submitted PR ( #29 )

@jakirkham jakirkham mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2022
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants